Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 04:05

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump must stop the AI bloodbath before it’s too late - The Hill
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Can you name a female actress who has had bad timing or luck in her film career?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is the word for truth and its meaning in Koine Greek?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
European Mars orbiter spies crumbling crater 'soaked in layers of Martian history' (photo) - Space
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Does Taylor Swift actually play the guitar, or is it a prop?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.